Safety ratings
2001 Ford Taurus 4-DR.
- Lane departure warningNo
- Forward collision warningNo
- Electronic stability controlNo
2001 Ford Taurus 4-DR. w/SAB
- Lane departure warningNo
- Forward collision warningNo
- Electronic stability controlNo
Crash test videos & photos
Crash test #1NHTSA test 3782
Full test report (PDF) ↗Recalls (10)
- EQUIPMENT:OTHER:OWNERS/SERVICE/OTHER MANUALCampaign 00V396000 · 28/11/2000
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: CERTAIN SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES, PICKUP TRUCKS, AND PASSENGER VEHICLES FAIL TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FMVSS 225, "CHILD RESTRAINT ANCHORAGE SYSTEMS." THE AFFECTED EXPEDITION/NAVIGATOR OWNER GUIDES DO NOT IDENTIFY THE LOCATIONS OF SEATING POSITIONS EQUIPPED WITH TETHER ANCHORAGES, AND DO NOT PROVIDE INSTRUCTIONS FOR SECURING CHILD SEATS TO THESE TETHER ANCHORAGES. THE F150 SC OWNER GUIDES DO NOT PROVIDE THE PROCEDURE FOR SECURING CHILD SEATS TO THE TETHER ANCHORAGES. THE TAURUS/SABLE OWNER GUIDES DO NOT IDENTIFY THE CENTER REAR SEATING POSITION AS HAVING LATCH COMPATIBLE LOWER ANCHORAGES.
Risk: IN THE EVENT OF A CRASH, THE CHILD SEAT MAY NOT BE PROPERLY ATTACHED INCREASING THE RISK OF INJURY TO THE CHILD.
Fix: OWNERS WILL BE PROVIDED WITH OWNER GUIDE INSERTS REVISED TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED INFORMATION, AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR AFFIXING THESE INSERTS TO THEIR OWNER GUIDES. CUSTOMERS WILL ALSO BE ADVISED THAT IF THEY PREFER, THEIR DEALER WILL AFFIX THE INSERTS TO THEIR OWNER GUIDES.
- EXTERIOR LIGHTING:BACK UP LIGHTSCampaign 01V048000 · 28/02/2001
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER SEDANS WITH FACTORY OR DEALER-INSTALLED DECK LID SPOILERS WITH LED CENTER HIGH MOUNTED STOP LAMPS (CHMSL). VEHICLES PRODUCED WITH SPOILERS WERE MANUFACTURED FROM MARCH 1 THROUGH OCTOBER 31, 2000; AND VEHICLES WITH SPOILERS INSTALLED BY DEALERS WERE MANUFACTURED FROM JANUARY 1 THOROUGH DECEMBER 30, 2000. WITH THE IGNITION SWITCH IN THE START OR RUN POSITIONS AND THE HAZARD WARNING LIGHTS OPERATING, THE CHMSL CAN ILLUMINATE (AT REDUCED INTENSITY) EVEN THOUGH THE SERVICE BRAKES HAVE NOT BEEN APPLIED. THIS DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF FMVSS NO. 108, "LAMPS, REFLECTIVE DEVICES, AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT." ALSO, IN SOME CASES THE VEHICLE BRAKE-SHIFT INTERLOCK WOULD NOT FUNCTION PROPERLY, ALLOWING THE SHIFT LEVER TO BE MOVED FROM PARK WITHOUT APPLYING THE BRAKE.
Risk: UNDER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STANDARD, THE CHMSL SHALL BE ACTIVATED ONLY UPON APPPLICATION OF THE SERVICE BRAKES. ALSO, THE VEHICLE COULD ROLL INCREASING THE RISK OF A CRASH, IF THE SHIFT LEVER CAN BE SHIFTED OUT OF PARK WITHOUT DEPRESSING THE BRAKE PEDAL.
Fix: DEALERS WILL INSTALL A JUMPER/RESISTOR ASSEMBLY AT THE SPOILER THAT PROVIDES AN ELECTRICAL RESISTOR TO GROUND AND CORRECTS THE CHMSL AND BRAKE-SHIFT INTERLOCK CONDITIONS. OWNER NOTIFICATION BEGAN MARCH 19, 2001. OWNERS WHO TAKE THEIR VEHICLES TO AN AUTHORIZED DEALER ON AN AGREED UPON SERVICE DATE AND DO NOT RECEIVE THE FREE REMEDY WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME SHOULD CONTACT FORD AT 1-800-392-3673.
- SEAT BELTS:FRONT:BUCKLE ASSEMBLYCampaign 01V144000 · 27/04/2001
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER CARS. THE SEAT BELT BUCKLE TONGUE MAY NOT FULLY EJECT FROM THE BUCKLE ASSEMBLY WHEN THE RELEASE BUTTON IS PUSHED SLOWLY. THIS CONDITION COULD ALSO RESULT IN A PARTIAL LATCH OF THE TONGUE IN THE BUCKLE.
Risk: IN THE EVENT OF A VEHICLE CRASH, THE VEHICLE OCCUPANT MAY NOT BE PROPERLY RESTRAINED, POSSIBLY RESULTING IN PERSONAL INJURY OR DEATH.
Fix: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE DRIVER AND RIGHT FRONT PASSENGER SEAT BELT BUCKLES. OWNER NOTIFICATION BEGAN MAY 4, 2001. OWNERS WHO TAKE THEIR VEHICLES TO AN AUTHORIZED DEALER ON AN AGREED UPON SERVICE DATE AND DO NOT RECEIVE THE FREE REMEDY WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME SHOULD CONTACT FORD AT 1-800-392-3673.
- SEAT BELTS:FRONT:ANCHORAGECampaign 00V240000 · 24/08/2000
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER VEHICLES. THE CHILD SAFETY SEAT ANCHOR LATCH (ISO-FIX ANCHOR) FASTENERS DO NOT HAVE ADEQUATE RESIDUAL TORQUE. THE ANCHORS ARE SECURED TO THE FLOOR PAN WITH A REINFORCEMENT PLATE THAT HAS TWO STUDS THAT EXTEND UPWARD THROUGH THE FLOOR PAN AND THE ISO-FIX ANCHOR. THE SEALER ON THE FLOOR PAN COULD CAUSE A SOFT JOINT AND, EVEN IF THE NUTS ARE PROPERLY TORQUED, ROAD VIBRATIONS COULD CAUSE THE NUT TO WORK ITS WAY COMPLETELY OFF THE STUD.
Risk: THE ANCHOR MAY NOT HOLD THE CHILD SAFETY SEAT IN POSITION DURING AN ACCIDENT, INCREASING THE RISK OF INJURY TO THE OCCUPANT OF THE CHILD SAFETY SEAT.
Fix: DEALERS WILL REMOVE AND RE-INSTALL THE BRACKET NUT USING A TORQUE RETENTION MATERIAL (RED LOCTITE). OWNER NOTIFICATION BEGAN SEPTEMBER 11, 2000. OWNERS WHO TAKE THEIR VEHICLES TO AN AUTHORIZED DEALER ON AN AGREED UPON SERVICE DATE AND DO NOT RECEIVE THE FREE REMEDY WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME SHOULD CONTACT FORD AT 1-800-392-3673.
- SUSPENSION:FRONT:SPRINGS:COIL SPRINGSCampaign 04V332000 · 15/07/2004
ON CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES ORIGINALLY SOLD IN OR CURRENTLY REGISTERED IN THE STATES OF CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, ILLINOIS, INDIANA, IOWA, KENTUCKY, MAINE, MARYLAND, MASSACHUSETTS, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, MISSOURI, NEW HAMPSHIRE, NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, OHIO, PENNSYLVANIA, RHODE ISLAND, VERMONT, WEST VIRGINIA, WISCONSIN, AND THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, THE FRONT COIL SPRINGS COULD FRACTURE DUE TO CORROSION ASSOCIATED WITH SALT USED ON THE ROADWAYS DURING THE WINTER. A FRACTURED SPRING COULD MOVE PAST THE SPRING SEAT AND CONTACT A FRONT TIRE.
Risk: IF THIS OCCURS, THE TIRE MAY RUPTURE RESULTING IN A RAPID AIR LOSS, WHICH COULD RESULT IN A CRASH.
Fix: DEALERS WILL INSTALL PROTECTIVE SPRING SHIELDS. IN ADDITION, FORD IS EXTENDING THE WARRANTY COVERAGE OF THE FRONT COIL SPRINGS IN ALL OTHER STATES, FOR FRACTURE ONLY, UP TO 10 YEARS OF SERVICE OR 150,000 MILES, WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST. IF THE VEHICLE HAS ALREADY ACCUMULATED MORE THAN 150,000 MILES, THIS COVERAGE WILL LAST UNTIL JULY 31, 2005. IF EITHER FRONT COIL SPRING FRACTURES, DEALERS WILL REPLACE BOTH FRONT SPRINGS AT NO CHARGE TO THE OWNER. AN INTERIM NOTICE WAS SENT TO OWNERS ON AUGUST 2, 2004. PARTS ARE NOW AVAILABLE FOR THE 2000-2001 MY VEHICLES AND OWNERS WERE SENT A LETTER ON JANUARY 10, 2005, ADVISING THEM TO BRING IN THEIR VEHICLES FOR REPAIR PARTS ARE EXPECTED TO BE AVAILABLE FOR THE 1999 MY VEHICLES BY THE END OF FEBRUARY 2005 AND OWNERS OF THESE VEHICLES WILL BE NOTIFIED THEN. OWNERS SHOULD CONTACT FORD AT 1-800-392-3673.
- EXTERIOR LIGHTING:TAIL LIGHTS:SWITCHCampaign 01V078000 · 12/03/2001
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH ADJUSTABLE PEDALS. IF THE GREASE FROM THE ADJUSTABLE PEDAL ASSEMBLY ENTERS THE STOP LAMP SWITCH, IT CAN CONTAMINATE THE CONTACTS LEADING TO CARBON BUILD UP, AND POTENTIALLY, A SHORT CIRCUIT.
Risk: A SHORT CIRCUIT COULD LEAD TO EITHER THE BRAKE LAMPS STAYING ON, OR TO A LOSS OF BRAKE LAMP FUNCTION, INCREASING THE RISK OF A CRASH.
Fix: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE BRAKE LAMP SWITCH AND WIPE DOWN THE ADJUSTABLE PEDAL ASSEMBLY TO REMOVE EXCESS GREASE. OWNER NOTIFICATION BEGAN MARCH 22, 2001. OWNERS WHO TAKE THEIR VEHICLES TO AN AUTHORIZED DEALER ON AN AGREED UPON SERVICE DATE AND DO NOT RECEIVE THE FREE REMEDY WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME SHOULD CONTACT FORD AT 1-800-392-3673.
- VISIBILITY:WINDSHIELD WIPER/WASHER:MOTORCampaign 01V258000 · 08/08/2001
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER CARS, SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES, AND LIGHT AND MEDIUM DUTY PICKUP TRUCKS. A SWITCH LOCATED IN THE PLASTIC COVER OF THE WIPER MOTOR GEAR CASE COULD MALFUNCTION AND OVERHEAT, POTENTIALLY RESULTING IN LOSS OF INTERMITTENT WIPER FUNCTION, LOSS OF WIPER PARK FUNCTION, COMPLETE LOSS OF WIPER FUNCTION, OR IGNITION OF THE PLASTIC COVER MATERIAL. SWITCH MALFUNCTION IS MOST LIKELY TO OCCUR WHEN THE INTERMITTENT SETTING OF THE WIPERS IS BEING USED, OR WHEN SNOW OR ICE OBSTRUCTS THE BLADES FROM RETURNING TO THE "PARKED" POSITION AT THE BOTTOM OF THE WINDSHIELD. THESE VEHICLES WERE BUILT AT THE FOLLOWING ASSEMBLY PLANTS: ATLANTA PLANT FROM 2/11/00 THROUGH 7/31/00; CHICAGO PLANT FROM 2/14/00 THROUGH 8/4/00; KANSAS CITY PLANT FROM 2/26/00 TO 9/4/00; KENTUCKY TRUCK PLANT FROM 2/18/00 TO 8/31/00; MICHIGAN TRUCK PLANT FROM 2/23/00 THROUGH 8/3/00; NORFOLK PLANT FROM 2/21/00 THROUGH 7/27/00; WAYNE STAMPING AND ASSEMBLY PLANT FROM 2/25/00 THROUGH 8/15/00; AND WIXOM PLANT FROM 2/15/00 THROUGH 8/8/00.
Risk: LOSS OF VISIBILITY WHILE DRIVING INCREASES THE RISK OF A CRASH.
Fix: DEALERS WILL INSPECT THE DATE CODE ON THE WIPER MOTOR. MOTORS BUILT WITH THE SUSPECT TIME FRAME WILL HAVE THE WIPER MOTOR GEAR CASE COVER REPLACED. OWNER NOTIFICATION BEGAN AUGUST 20, 2001. OWNERS WHO TAKE THEIR VEHICLES TO AN AUTHORIZED DEALER ON AN AGREED UPON SERVICE DATE AND DO NOT RECEIVE THE FREE REMEDY WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME SHOULD CONTACT FORD AT 1-866-436-7332.
- SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:PEDALS AND LINKAGESCampaign 02V266000 · 02/10/2002
CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH ADJUSTABLE PADELS ARE BEING RECALLED IN ORDER TO ADJUST THE BRAKE AND ACCELERATOR PEDALS TO A MINIMUM OF 50 MM OF LATERAL SEPARATION. SIMULTANEOUS APPLICATION OF BOTH THE BRAKE AND ACCELERATOR PEDALS COULD RESULT IN AN INCREASE IN ENGINE RPM.
Risk: THIS COULD RESULT IN A CUSTOMER EXPERIENCING AN "UNINTENDED VEHICLE SPEED INCREASE" OR A PERCEIVED "UNABLE TO STOP" CONDITION.
Fix: OWNERS WILL BE INSTRUCTED AS TO THE PROPER WAY TO SET THE POSITION OF THE PEDALS AND TO TAKE THEIR VEHICLES TO A DEALER TO HAVE THE SPACING BETWEEN THE BRAKE AND ACCELERATOR PEDALS MEASURED. IF THE SPACING IS FOUND TO BE LESS THAN 50 MM, THE DEALER WILL ADJUST THE PEDALS TO INCREASE THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THEM TO GREATER THAN 50 MM. OWNER NOTIFICATION BEGAN OCTOBER 28, 2002. OWNERS WHO DO NOT RECEIVE THE FREE REMEDY WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME SHOULD CONTACT FORD AT 1-866-436-7332.
- EXTERIOR LIGHTING:BRAKE LIGHTS:SWITCHCampaign 04V106000 · 02/03/2004
CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES ARE BEING RECALLED TO CORRECT A PROBLEM WITH A MALFUNCTIONING STOP LAMP SWITCH AND/OR ASSOCIATED WIRING. THIS MALFUNCTIONING COULD RENDER THE STOP LAMPS INOPERABLE OR CAUSE THEM TO STAY ON ALL THE TIME. THIS COULD CAUSE CONFUSION TO A FOLLOWING DRIVER, WHICH COULD LEAD TO A CRASH.
Risk: IN ADDITION, IF THE SWITCH AND/OR ASSOCIATED WIRING FAIL IN THE OPEN POSITION, THE BRAKE LIGHTS WILL NOT ACTUATE AND THE DRIVER WILL NOT BE ABLE TO SHIFT THE VEHICLE OUT OF "PARK" IF THEY FAIL IN THE CLOSED POSITION, THE BRAKE LIGHTS WILL REMAIN ON, WHICH WILL NOT ALLOW THE SPEED CONTROL TO BE ACTIVATED. THIS COULD ALSO CAUSE THE BATTERY TO DISCHARGE.
Fix: DEALERS WILL REMOVE THE STOP LAMP SWITCH AND ASSOCIATED WIRING ASSEMBLY AND INSTALL A NEWLY DESIGNED STOP LAMP SWITCH AND WIRE ASSEMBLY. OWNER NOTIFICATION IS EXPECTED TO BEGIN ON APRIL 5, 2004. OWNERS SHOULD CONTACT FORD AT 1-800-392-3673.
- SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:FOUNDATION COMPONENTS:DISC:PADSCampaign 16E026000 · 01/04/2016
Bosch Brake Components LLC (Bosch) is recalling certain aftermarket replacement front brake pads, models Bosch QuietCast BC598 and BP765, Bosch Blue BE598 and BE598H, Prostop PD598 and PD765M, Duralast Gold DG598, Duralast MKD598, Stop Master ST598, UltraStop ULT598, UltraLife MX598 and MX765, BrakeBest MKD765, and Prostop Platinum PGD598. These brake pads, manufactured October 1, 2014, to October 31, 2015 are intended for use on 2001-2007 Ford Taurus, 2001-2005 Mercury Sable, 1995-1999 Ford Taurus SHO, 1995-2002 Lincoln Continental, and 1993-1998 Lincoln Mark VIII vehicles. The brake pad shim may shift out of position causing the shim to contact the brake disc resulting in damage to the disc.
Risk: A damaged or broken brake disc may reduce a vehicle's braking power, increasing the risk of a crash.
Fix: Bosch will instruct the owners how to have the affected brake pads replaced, free of charge. The recall began on May 26, 2016. Owners may contact Bosch customer service at 1-888-715-3616.
Owner complaints
Most-reported areas
- SUSPENSION217
- SERVICE BRAKES60
- HYDRAULIC54
- VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL47
- AIR BAGS36
- ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING31
- POWER TRAIN29
- ELECTRICAL SYSTEM23
Read individual complaints (50 most recent)
These are unverified consumer reports filed with NHTSA, shown as submitted.
- 12/31/2012· SUSPENSION
THE FRONT, LEFT COIL SPRING BROKE LEAVING A JAGGED EDGE THAT SHREDDED THE TIRES SIDEWALL WHEN THE CAR WAS PUT IN REVERSE. I DO NOT KNOW EXACTLY WHEN THE SPRING BROKE, BUT I WAS DRIVING ON THE FREEWAY PRIOR TO PARKING THE VEHICLE. HAD THIS HAPPENED ON THE FREEWAY, THE RESULTS COULD HAVE BEEN DISASTROUS. THE TIRE THAT WAS SHREDDED WAS A NEAR NEW STUDDED SNOW TIRE. THE TOTAL COST TO REPAIR THE SUSPENSION AND REPLACE THE TIRE WILL BE ABOUT 400 - 500 DOLLARS. *TR
- 12/31/2010· FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE
2001 FORD TAURUS IAC VALVE FAILURE AT 54,200 MILES. *TR
- 12/31/2009· VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2001 FORD TAURUS. WHEN DRIVING 25 MPH THE VEHICLE SPEED CRUISE CONTROL WILL ACTIVATE AND THEN DEACTIVATE WITHOUT INTENTION. ALSO HE HAS TO TURN OFF THE ENGINE IN ORDER TO DISENGAGE THE SPEED CONTROL. THE VEHICLE HAS NOT BEEN TAKEN TO THE DEALER NOR HAS THE MANUFACTURER BEEN NOTIFIED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 136,000. UPDATED 01/26/10 *BF WHEN THE CONSUMER ATTEMPTED TO SET THE CRUISE CONTROL, THERE WERE TIMES WHEN IT DIDN'T WORK AND TIMES WHEN IT DID WORK. WHEN IT WAS ENGAGED, AND THE CONSUMER APPLIED THE BRAKE TO REDUCE SPEED WITHOUT TOUCHING THE RESUME BUTTON THE VEHICLE WOULD TAKE OFF AT THE PRESET SPEED. EVEN WHEN USING THE OFF, THE CRUISE WOULD RESUME TO THE PRESET SPEED. THE ONLY WAY TO DISENGAGE THE CRUISE CONTROL WAS TO TURN THE VEHICLE OFF. UPDATED 01/26/10.*JB
- 12/31/2008· SUSPENSION
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2001 FORD TAURUS. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC FOR REPAIR SERVICE. THE TECHNICIAN OBSERVED THAT THE REAR COIL SPRING FAILED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGES WERE 69,000. UPDATED 020209 *BF UPDATED 02/03/09.*JB
- 12/31/2007· VISIBILITYFire
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2001 FORD TAURUS. THE CONTACT HAD JUST REFILLED THE WASHER WINDOW FLUID AND PRESSED THE BUTTON FOR THE FLUID A SECOND TIME WHEN HE BEGAN TO SMELL SMOKE. BY THE TIME HE AND HIS DAUGHTER EXITED THE VEHICLE, FLAMES WERE RISING FROM UNDER THE HOOD. THE VEHICLE WAS DESTROYED. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT EXTINGUISHED THE FIRE AND A REPORT WAS FILED. NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER 01V258000 (VISIBILITY:WINDSHIELD WIPER/WASHER: MOTOR) WAS REFERENCED. THE CURRENT AND FAILURE MILEAGES WERE 124,004.
- 12/31/2001· POWER TRAIN
WHEN PARKED ON INCLINES & SHIFTING FROM PARK TO REVERSE OR DRIVE TRANSMISSION JERKS & CLANKS VERY BAD!DEALLERSHIP SAID THAT IS NORMAL FOR THE FORD TAURUS I FIND THIS HARD TO BELEIVE. *AK
- 12/30/2006· SUSPENSIONCrash
DRIVING 25 MPH, STRAIGHT & SMOOTH WHEN REAR COIL SPRING SNAPPED PUNCTURING TIRE & HIT GARAGE BEFORE STOPPING. PART REPLACED AT MY EXPENSE AT A DEALER. PART IS NOT AVAILABLE. REAL SAFETY ISSUE HERE AND COULD HAVE BEEN BAD IF IT HAPPENED WHILE HIGHWAY DRIVING. FORD SHOULD HAVE EXTENDED THE WARRANTY ON THESE SPRINGS LIKE THEY DID ON THE FRONT ONES. THE FRONT COIL SPRING ALSO SNAPPED ON THIS CAR EARLIER IN THE YEAR. *NM
- 12/30/2005· SUSPENSION
1- LEFT REAR (DRIVER SIDE) COIL SPRING BROKE. VEHICLE WAS UNDER NO LOAD EXCEPT FOR THE DRIVER IN THE CAR, TRUNK AND REAR SEAT WERE EMPTY. 2- THE REAR COIL SPRING JUST BROKE AND DAMAGED THE INNER SIDEWALL OF THE CORRESPONDING TIRE. THE TIRE DID NOT DEFLATE. 3- BOTH REAR COILS WERE REPLACED ($ 457.34) AND THE TIRE WAS REPLACED AS WELL ($ 76.99). THE FAILED REAR COIL IS NOT AVAILABLE AS, AT THAT TIME, I WAS NOT AWARE THAT THERE WAS A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION BY THE NHTSA INTO COIL SPRING FAILURES IN 2001 FORD TAURUS VEHICLES. *NM
- 12/30/2002· POWER TRAIN
NHTSA# 15190 01-F-071-000 AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION LOOSE THIRD GEAR OPERATION. CONSUMER STATES HAVING PROBLEM WITH THE AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION WHICH BROKE ON AUGUST 8, 2002. DEALER CHARGED OVER TWO THOUSANDS DOLLARS, FOUR MONTHS LATER VEHICLE HAS THE SAME PROBLEM WITH THE TRANSMISSION. PLEASE PROVIDE FURTHER INFORMATION.
- 12/29/2008· SUSPENSION
2001 FORD TAURUS WITH 69,000 MILES HAS A BROKEN REAR COIL SPRING. THERE IS A PROBLEM WITH THE FRONT COILS WHICH FORD WILL FIX NO CHARGE UNDER 04M04 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION GUARANTEE BUT IT DOES NOT COVER THE REAR SPRINGS. IN THE EVENT OF THE BACK SPRING WORKING IT'S WAY TO THE TIRE THERE HAS BEEN REAR TIRE BLOWOUTS WITH EXTENSIVE DAMAGE TO THE VEHICLE ITSELF AND A DANGER TO THE DRIVER AND PASSENGERS. AT THIS TIME MY MOTHER WAS INFORMED THAT THIS WAS BEING LOOKED INTO AS A MANDATORY RECALL. I FEEL SINCE THEY HAVE HAD PROBLEMS WITH THE FRONT AND HAVE ACKNOWLEDGED THE DEFECT THAT THERE IS ALSO A PROBLEM WITH THE REAR SPRINGS OF THOSE SAME YEARS. PARTS REQUIRED TO CORRECT PROBLEM ARE NEW COILS BOTH SIDES. WE TOOK IT TO THE DEALERSHIP AND THE SERVICE MANAGER SAID HE THINKS THERE SHOULD BE A MANDATORY RECALL BUT HE DID NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO MAKE THAT DECISION AND REFERRED ME TO YOU. THE COST TO MY MOTHER WHICH IS ON A FIXED BUDGET IS 600.00 AND SHE CANNOT AFFORD IT. THE SERVICE MANGER ADVISED HER TO GET IT FIXED BEFORE IT CAUSED NUMEROUS PROBLEMS WHICH WOULD NOT BE COVERED EVEN THOUGH THE DAMAGE OCCURRED FROM THE BROKEN COIL SPRING. AT THIS TIME THERE HAS NOT BEEN ANY DANGEROUS OCCURRENCES BUT THERE ARE A POSSIBILITY OF THEM HAPPENING AT ANY TIME. PLEASE LOOK CLOSER AT THIS DANGEROUS SITUATION AND MAKE IT MANDATORY TO HAVE FORD MOTOR COMPANY FIX THIS PROBLEM. THANK YOU BRAD FARROW *TR
- 12/29/2004· LATCHES/LOCKS/LINKAGES
BOTH REAR DOOR AND FRONT PASS. DOOR LATCH SPRINGS WILL NOT RETRACT HANDLE/LATCHES. PASSENGER THINKS THEY HAVE CLOSED DOOR, BUT HANDLE IS UP/OUT AND DOOR IS NOT LATCHED. DOOR FLIES OPEN ON A TURN IN ROAD. *NM
- 12/28/2007· SUSPENSION
FAILURE/FRACTURE OF FRONT SUSPENSION COIL SPRINGS AND RELATED TIRE DAMAGE. MY CAR WAS REPAIRED AS FAR AS THE FRONT SUSPENSION IS CONCERNED UNDER WARRANTY ONLY FOR SPRINGS. MY CONCERN IS FUTURE SPRING FAILURE ON REAR SUSPENSION WHICH IS KNOWN TO HAVE SIMILAR FAILURES WITH NO SAFETY RECALL IN EFFECT AT THIS TIME. DESPITE THE NHTSA TESTS ON SIMILAR VEHICLE DEFECT, I AM NOT CONVINCED THAT THE POTENTIAL FOR A LOSS OF VEHICLE CONTROL INCIDENT IS UNLIKELY. I WONDER IF ONE OF THE NHTSA PERSONS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE TEST INFORMATION WOULD LET ME TRADE VEHICLES WITH THEM. WOULD THEY BE WILLING TO DRIVE THIS CAR FOR EXTENDED USE ON CROWDED INTERSTATE HIGHWAYS IN ALL WEATHER CONDITIONS LIKE SO MANY OF US DO? THE PARTS IN QUESTION FAIL BECAUSE OF CORROSION. IN MOST CASES THE SPRING BREAKS AT THE LOWER FIRST COIL, FORD HAS INSTALLED A SHIELD TO PREVENT RELATED TIRE DAMAGE PER NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER: 04V332000 HERE IS MY POINT AS PLAINLY AS I CAN PUT IT. THESE SPRINGS WILL CORRODE AT ANY LOCATION DUE TO STONE CHIPS OR OTHER SURFACE IMPERFECTIONS. AS A RESULT THESE SPRINGS HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO BREAK AT ANY LOCATION RENDERING THE SHIELD AT THE LOWER COIL USELESS. THE RESULT COULD BE A LOSS OF VEHICLE CONTROL REGARDLESS OF WHICH, FRONT OR REAR, POSITION. SHOULD NOT FORD MOTOR COMPANY BE MANDATED TO AT LEAST INSPECT THESE PARTS FOR CORROSION IN OTHER THAN THE COMMON POINT OF FAILURE, AND IF NECESSARY REPLACE THEM? FORD HAS INTRODUCED REPLACEMENT SPRINGS WITH IMPROVED CORROSION RESISTANT COATINGS, BUT IN THE CASE OF THE REAR SUSPENSION SPRINGS ON THE SAME VEHICLES KNOWN TO HAVE SIMILAR FAILURES, THERE IS NO CURRENT CONSUMER PROTECTION MANDATED. PLEASE TELL ME THAT YOU ARE GOING TO CORRECT THIS ISSUE. ISN'T IT OBVIOUS THAT AT BEST THIS PROBLEM IS ONLY HALF CORRECTED! SINCE WHEN IS THAT GOOD ENOUGH? THANKS FOR ALL YOUR SUCCESSES IN THE MATTER OF MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY! I HOPE THIS ISSUE WILL SOON BE ADDED TO THE LIST. BOB ZAMOST *TR
- 12/28/2006· SUSPENSIONCrash
TL* - THE CONTACT'S VEHICLE WAS IN A CRASH DUE TO THE STRUT FAILURE. THE CONTACT SAID THAT SHE WAS DRIVING 40 MPH UNDER DRY CONDITIONS WHEN THE FAILURE ACCURRED. THE CONTACT'S VEHICLE SPUN AND THEN HIT A TREE. SHE STATED THAT SHE HAD A MECHANIC LOOK AT THE VEHICLE. AND MECHANICTOLD HER THAT THE COIL SPRING WAS THE CAUSE OF THE FAILURE. SHE ALSO STATED THAT SHE HAD THE CRASHED CAR IN DRIVEWAY.*AK UPDATE (JUNE 17, 2008): MS. EDWARD SAID THAT SHE WAS DRIVING AROUND A CURVE WHEN SHE SUDDENLY LOST CONTROL OF HER 2001 FORD TAURUS AND STRUCK A TREE. THE MECHANICAL TOLD HER THAT IT WAS A REAR (NOT FRONT) SUSPENSION SPRING HAD FAILED. THE CRASHED VEHICLE WAS TOWED BACK TO HER HOUSE AND SAT THERE SINCE (NOT REPAIRED).
- 12/28/2005· SUSPENSION
WHILE MY WIFE WAS DRIVING HOME FROM WORK THE LEFT REAR SPRING IN SNAPPED OFF PUNCTURING THE SIDE WALL OF THE LEFT REAR TIRE AT APPROXIMATELY 45 MPH. THE TIRE DEFLATED SUDDENLY AND MY WIFE WAS ABLE TO PULL THE CAR OFF THE ROAD. AFTER THE TIRE WAS CHANGED THE CAR WAS DRIVEN TO THE FORD DEALER WHERE WE HAD TO HAVE BOTH SPRINGS IN THE REAR REPLACED AND A NEW TIRE PUT ON AND A ALIGNMENT COSTING $507.00 TOTAL. OUR CAR IS A 2001 FORD TAURUS WITH 38000 MILES ON IT AND THIS IS THE SECOND EXPENSIVE REPAIR THIS YEAR. IN JULY WE LOST THE ELECTRIC MOTOR ON THE POWER SEAT AND THAT COST OVER $400.00 WITH FORDS ASSISTANCE ON THE BILL. *NM
- 12/28/2001· POWER TRAIN
VEHICLE MAKES A CLUNKING NOISE WHEN PUTTING IT INTO GEAR. *TT
- 12/27/2006· SUSPENSION
AT 50,000 MILES, THE DRIVERS' SIDE REAR COIL SPRING BROKE AND PUNCTURED REAR TIRE. I REPLACED BOTH REAR COIL SPRINGS AS WELL AS WORN STRUTS AND BOUGHT TWO NEW TIRES. I DID NOT KEEP THE OLD PARTS. *JB
- 12/27/2004· SUSPENSION
MANUFACTURER'S RECALL 04S17 FOR THE FRONT COIL SPRING WAS ISSUED IN AUGUST 2004, AND DEALER STATED THEY STILL DID NOT HAVE THE PARTS AVAILABLE. *AK
- 12/26/2007· SUSPENSION
LEFT REAR COIL SPRING BROKE WHILE CAR WAS IN PARKING LOT AND BEING OCCUPIED BY 4 ADULTS. BROKEN SPRING DID NOT COME IN CONTACT WITH TIRE, BUT WAS DANGEROUSLY CLOSE. FORD GARAGE ON VACATION DIAGNOSED PROBLEM AND CUT AWAY ENOUGH OF THE SPRING END TO SAFELY CLEAR TIRE TO BE ABLE TO DRIVE THE CAR 320 MILES FROM VACATION TO HOME. ARRANGED FOR HOME TOWN FORD GARAGE TO REPLACE BOTH REAR COIL SPRINGS FOR $400. *TR
- 12/26/2006· SUSPENSION
DRIVING DOWN THE HIGH WAY AND THE BACK COIL SPRING BROKE AND PUNCTURED MY TIRE. I CALLED FORD DEALERSHIP TO SEE IF ON RECALL LIKE THE FRONT COIL SPRINGS AND THEY ARE NOT. I HAD TO PAY TO GET REPLACED ALONG WITH THE TIRE. *JB
- 12/26/2004· SUSPENSION
2001 FORD TAURUS, I WAS TURNING INTO MY HOME DRIVEWAY, WHEN THE FRONT LEFT STRUT SPRING BROKE (DRIVE IS TYPICAL SUBURBAN DRIVE,NO REMARKABLE BUMPS OR TURNS). THE ACTION CAUSED THE BROKEN PIECE TO SHEER THE TIRE FROM THE WHEEL IN ONE REVOLUTION OF THE WHEEL. THE TIRE PEELED OUT FROM UNDER THE WHEEL (AS I WAS IN A SLOW SPEED RIGHT-HAND TURN >10MPH)AND I LOST CONTROL AND ABILITY TO SAFELY STOP.THE CAR FELL TO THE GROUND (ON IT'S FRAME) AS THE SUSPENSION HAD GIVEN WAY AND THE TIRE HAD LOST ALL SHAPE. THE CAR IS CURRENTLY IN THE SHOP FOR REPAIR AND IT IS UNKNOW THE TOTAL DAMAGE TO THE VEHICLE,NOR THE INTENTION OF THE MANUFACTURER. I CAN ONLY IMAGINE WHAT WOULD HAVE HAPPENED TO THIS VEHICLE PART FAILED AT SPEED! THAT IS MY REASON FOR CONTACTING YOU, OTHERS NEED TO KNOW!*AK
- 12/24/2008· SUSPENSION
I NOTICED THAT AFTER INSTALLING FOUR BRAND NEW TIRES ON MY 2001 FORD TAURUS, THAT THE VEHICLE PULLED TO THE RIGHT DRAMATICALLY WHILE DRIVING. THE ALIGNMENT WAS JUST DONE AS WELL. I ALSO NOTICED THAT THE REAR OF THE VEHICLE SAT EXTREMELY LOW. FURTHER INVESTIGATION FOUND THAT THE REAR COIL SPRING ON THE RIGHT SIDE HAD SNAPPED AT THE BASE OF STRUT. FRONT SPRINGS HAVE A RECALL, WHY NOT THE FRONT. I AM AWARE OF THE PROBLEMS ON THIS SUBJECT AS I AM FORMERLY A SERVICE ADVISOR FOR FORD. THIS IS AN ALL TOO COMMON PROBLEM AND DOES POSE A SAFETY PROBLEM!!!! THIS IS TRUE AS THE VEHICLE FAILS NYSI AND MAKES VEHICLE UNDRIVEABLE. FORD WILL NOT REPAIR, YET THERE ARE HUNDREDS, IF NOT THOUSANDS OF THE SAME EXACT CONCERN. MY VEHICLE IS IN PERFECT OPERATING CONDITION AND CARED FOR WELL. THIS SHOULD NOT HAPPEN! APPARENTLY UNTIL SOMEONE DIES, FORD AND THE GOVERNMENT WILL NOT DO ANYTHING ABOUT THIS. MY 2001 IMPALA AND MY 2002 CAVALIER BOTH HAD WELL OVER 100K, NEVER HAD THIS PROBLEM AND THEY WERE IN THE SALT STATES THEIR ENTIRE OPERATING LIVES!! THERE MUST BE SOMETHING DONE NOW PLEASE. I AM FORCED TO REPAIR THE VEHICLE AT MY OWN COST FOR SOMETHING THAT IS WELL KNOWN BY THE GOVERNMENT AND FORD. *TR
- 12/24/2005· SUSPENSION
ON DECEMBER 15TH, I PULLED OUT OF MY DRIVEWAY AT ABOUT 5 MPH AND HEARD A CLUNKING NOISE FROM THE REAR OF THE CAR. I GOT OUT AND CHECKED THE REAR TIRES AND FOUND THAT THEY WERE STILL INFLATED. I PULLED OUT TO LEAVE MY DRIVEWAY AND HEARD A LOUD SCREECHING NOISE AS I DROVE AWAY. I DROVE BACK INTO MY DRIVEWAY AND FOUND THAT THE LEFT REAR TIRE WAS FLAT. I REPLACED THE TIRE WITH THE DOUGHNUT AND WAS ABLE TO DRIVE THE CAR. ASSUMING THAT THE PROBLEM WAS A PUNCTURED TIRE, I TOOK THE TIRE TO A LOCAL PLACE FOR A TIRE REPAIR. THEY REPORTED THAT THE TREAD HAD SEPARATED FROM THE TIRE, BUT DIDN'T KNOW WHY. THEY REPLACED THE TIRE AND AS MY WIFE DROVE AWAY, SHE HEARD THE SCREECHING NOISE AND AFTER INVESTIGATION, THE SHOP FOUND THAT THE REAR SPRING HAD FALLEN DOWN AND GOUGED THE TIRE, CAUSING THE TREAD SEPARATION. THE CAR HAS BEEN TAKEN TO THE DEALER FOR REPLACEMENT OF THE REAR SPRINGS, AT MY COST. WHAT I DON'T UNDERSTAND IS WHY FORD IS TAKING CARE OF THE FRONT SPRING ISSUE BUT ISN'T TAKING CARE OF THE REAR SPRING ISSUE WHEN THE CAUSE OF THE REAR SPRING ISSUES IS FULLY KNOWN AND UNDERSTOOD. FORD NEEDS TO RECALL AND REPLACE THE REAR SPRINGS BEFORE PEOPLE ARE KILLED DUE TO THEIR OBVIOUS NEGLIGENCE. *JB
- 12/23/2009· SUSPENSION
2001 FORD TAURUS LEFT REAR COIL SPRING BROKE WHILE DRIVING 60 MPH, END OF BROKEN SPRING CUT AND SHREDDED TIRE. REPLACEMENT COST FOR NEW TIRE AND TWO NEW QUICK STRUTS IS COSTING ME $1080.00. FORD HAS A RECALL ON THE FRONT SPRINGS AND WOULD REPLACE UP TO 200,000 MILES OR TEN YEARS. THEY KNOW THEY HAVE REAR SPRING PROBLEMS BUT UP TO NOW ARE UNWILLING TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT THEM. *TR
- 12/23/2006· SUSPENSION
2001 FORD TAURUS (48302 ODOMETER) REAR COIL SPRING BROKE REPLACED SPRINGS WITH REAR STRUTS. *NM
- 12/23/2004· SUSPENSION
CONSUMER RECEIVED RECALL 04V332000 CONCERNING FRONT COIL SPRING, AND CONTACTED HIS LOCAL DEALER WHO ADVISED THE CONSUMER TO WAIT UNTIL SOMETHING HAPPENED BEFORE BRINGING THE VEHICLE IN.*AK
- 12/22/2014· SEAT BELTS
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2001 FORD TAURUS. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE FRONT PASSENGER SIDE BUCKLE ASSEMBLY WAS NOT FUNCTIONING PROPERLY. THE CONTACT MENTIONED THAT THE SEAT BELT WAS ABLE TO BE SECURED BUT WAS EXTREMELY DIFFICULT TO RELEASE. THE CONTACT HAD TO MAKE SEVERAL ATTEMPTS FOR THE FRONT PASSENGER SIDE SEAT BELT BUCKLE TO RELEASE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE VIN WAS NOT INCLUDED IN NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBERS: 01V144000 (SEAT BELTS) AND 00V240000 (SEAT BELTS). THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS NOT AVAILABLE. UPDATED 01/13/15*LJ
- 12/22/2004· SUSPENSION
RECALL NUMBER 04V332000: CONSUMER HAS BEEN WAITING TO BE CONTACTED SINCE OCTOBER FOR THE RECALL PART. HOWEVER, THE PARTS STILL HAVE NOT ARRIVED. THE CONSUMER HAS BEEN CALLING THE DEALER AND MANUFACTURER FOR SOMETIME NOW, AND HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY RESULTS. PLEASE PROVIDE ANY FURTHER INFORMATION. *JB
- 12/22/2003· VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
WHEN AT A STOP VEHICLE HESITATED BEFORE ACCELERATING. DEALERSHIP MECHANIC WAS NOTIFIED, BUT DID NOT RESOLVE THE PROBLEM. *AK
- 12/21/2009· EXTERIOR LIGHTING
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2001 FORD TAURUS. WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 65 MPH ON NORMAL ROAD CONDITIONS, THE CRUISE CONTROL FAILED TO ACTIVATE. THE BRAKE LIGHTS ALSO REMAINED ON WHEN THE VEHICLE WAS IN OPERATION AND STATIONARY. THE FAILURES OCCURRED INTERMITTENTLY. NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER 04V106000, EXTERIOR LIGHTING:BRAKE LIGHTS, SWITCH IS RELATED TO THE FAILURE; HOWEVER, THE VIN WAS EXCLUDED FROM THE RECALL. THE VEHICLE HAS NOT BEEN REPAIRED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 99,000 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 99,900.
- 12/21/2006· SUSPENSION
ON 12-14-06 I WAS SITTING IN MY 2001 FORD TAURUS WHEN BOTH SPRINGS BROKE I TOOK THE CAR TO DEALER WHERE THEY REPLACED BOTH REAR SPRINGS STRUTS AND MOUNTS. LUCKILY, I WAS NOT DRIVING THE CAR AT THAT TIME. DEALER SAID THESE WERE NOT COVERED ON THE RECALL ONLY THE FRONT SPRINGS. *JB
- 12/21/2005· SUSPENSION,ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
DT: THE CONTACT STATES THERE IS RECALL NHTSA CAMPAIGN 04V332000 CONCERNING THE FRONT COIL SPRINGS; THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED BY THE PREVIOUS OWNER ACCORDING TO THE RECALL. NOW, THE CONTACT HAS THE SAME PROBLEM, WHICH WAS AFFECTING THE REAR COILS SPRINGS. IT WAS REPAIRED AT THE CONTACT'S EXPENSE. *AK THE CONSUMER HAD TO PURCHASE A NEW STARTER UPDATED 01/11/06. *JB
- 12/20/2008· SUSPENSION
REAR COIL SPRINGS BREAK! I REMEMBER THE RECALL FOR FRONT COIL SPRINGS. BUT WHY FORD DOESN'T RECALL REAR AS THEY BREAK AS OFTEN AS THE FRONT ONES?? *TR
- 12/20/2007· SUSPENSION
MY WIFE OWNS A 2001 FORD TAURUS IN WHICH THE DRIVER'S SIDE REAR COIL SPRING BROKE WHILE BACKING IT OUT OF THE GARAGE. IT HAD ALREADY BEEN TAKEN TO THE DEALERSHIP FOR A RECALL ON THE FRONT SPRINGS BECAUSE ONE OF THEM BROKE WHILE I WAS DRIVING IT. AFTER CONTACTING THE FORD CUSTOMER ASSISTANCE CENTER (1-800-392-3673) TODAY, THEY TOLD ME THAT THEY DON'T HAVE A RECALL ON THIS PROBLEM AND ALL COSTS TO REPAIR WOULD BE MINE. OBVIOUSLY THEY HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THIS MODEL YEAR AND THEY WON'T STAND BEHIND THEIR PRODUCT. THE CAR CURRENTLY HAS 87,400 MILES ON IT. THIS DOESN'T SEEM LIKE A LOT CONSIDERING THE TYPE OF FAILURE THAT HAS OCCURRED AGAIN. I ALSO NOTICED A NUMBER OF COMPLAINTS POSTED ON THE INTERNET ABOUT THIS PROBLEM. *TR
- 12/20/2004· SUSPENSION
DEALERSHIP WANTED TO CHARGE THE CONSUMER TO INSPECT THE VEHICLE BEFORE PERFORMING FRONT COIL SPRING RECALL 04V332000 REPAIRS. *AK
- 12/19/2020· VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
THE CAR WILL SOMETIMES STAY AT HIGH RPMS EVEN WHEN PRESSURE IS RELEASED ON THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL. THIS HAPPENED TO ME IN 2018 WHEN I FIRST GOT THE CAR AND HAS HAPPENED RECENTLY IN DECEMBER 2020. IN THE FIRST EPISODE, I DEPRESSED THE BRAKE AND THE CAR DID NOT SLOW DOWN UNTIL I SHIFTED TO NEUTRAL. IN THE SECOND, MY WIFE HAD TO THROW IT INTO PARK. THE CAR WAS IN MOTION ON A CITY STREET IN BOTH INSTANCES GOING STRAIGHT
- 12/19/2011· POWER TRAIN
CAR BECAME INCREASINGLY DIFFICULT TO SHIFT OUT OF PARK. AT THIS TIME THE BRAKE LIGHTS WERE WORKING. FOUND A WORK AROUND ON THE INTERNET THAT WORKED. ALSO FOUND A RECALL (04S12) FOR SAME PROBLEM BUT MY VIN WAS NOT COVERED AND FORD WILL NOT FIX. HOWEVER, THEY DO NOT SELL THE STOP LIGHT SWITCH (WHICH IS MOST LIKELY THE PART I NEED) BY ITSELF ANYMORE. YOU MUST BUY A MORE EXPENSIVE KIT THAT INCLUDES THE STOP LIGHT SWITCH AND WIRING ON THE BRAKE PEDAL. NOW MY BRAKE LIGHTS ARE COMPLETELY OUT SO WE CANNOT DRIVE THE CAR. SEEMS IF FORD WON'T SELL JUST THE SWITCH THEN THEY ARE ACKNOWLEDGING THAT THIS IS A SAFETY ISSUE AND MY CAR SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE RECALL. I FOUND MANY OTHER PEOPLE WITH THE SAME PROBLEM WHEN I WAS LOOKING FOR A SOLUTION TO THE SHIFTING OUT OF PARK PROBLEM. I HAVE CALLED FORD TWICE BUT THEY BASICALLY SAY "SORRY YOU ARE NOT PART OF THE RECALL." AND REGARDING WHETHER THERE WERE A CRASH, IF MY DAUGHTER HAD KEPT DRIVING IT THERE MOST LIKELY WOULD HAVE BEEN ONE, AS BRAKE LIGHTS ARE PRETTY IMPORTANT. *TR
- 12/19/2005· SUSPENSION
I OWN A 2001 FORD TAURUS SES WITH 55000 MILES ON IT. IN APRIL, 2005 THE FRONT COIL SPRING RECALL WAS DONE ON THIS CAR. TODAY, THE RIGHT REAR COIL SPRING BROKE AT ABOUT 30 MPH, CUT THE INSIDE OF THE TIRE AND PUNCTURED IT. FORD DEALER STATES THAT THEY CAN'T DO ANYTHING FOR ME AS THERE IS NO RECALL ON THAT PART. THEY WERE VERY HAPPY TO TAKE $600 TO FIX THE SPRING AND SHOCK AS WELL AS DO THE SAME ON THE LEFT SIDE, SINCE THAT WOULD PROBABLY BREAK TOMORROW. PLUS, EVEN THOUGH FORD CLEARLY HAS UNDER-SPECIFIED THESE SPRINGS, I EVEN GET TO PAY FOR A NEW TIRE! LAST FORD PRODUCT I BUY. *NM
- 12/19/2001· SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC
STOPPING DISTANCE HAS CHANGED. THERE ARE 4 WHEEL DISC BRAKES ONLY ON FRONT, THEY SHOULD BE ON THE REAR ALSO. PLEASE PROVIDE ANY FURTHER INFORMATION.*AK
- 12/18/2014· SUSPENSION
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2001 FORD TAURUS. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE FRONT PASSENGER SIDE COIL SPRING FRACTURED. IN ADDITION, THE CONTACT DISCOVERED THAT THE COIL SPRING PUNCTURED THROUGH THE FRONT PASSENGER SIDE TIRE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE VIN WAS INCLUDED IN NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER: 04V332000 (SUSPENSION) BUT THE DEALER REFUSED TO PERFORM THE REMEDY ON THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 40,000.
- 12/16/2011· STRUCTURE,LATCHES/LOCKS/LINKAGES
ONCE AGAIN MY DOOR LATCHES WILL NOT CLOSE WHEN THE WEATHER IS CLOSED. I HAVE TO DRIVE AROUND HOLDING MY DOOR SHUT. I REPORTED THIS TO FORD AND THEY SAID THAT THEY WILL NOT FIX IT. IT IS A KNOWN ISSUE TO THIS VEHICLE AND IS INCREDIBLY DANGEROUS. PLEASE DO SOMETHING ABOUT THIS! *TR
- 12/16/2006· SUSPENSION
THE REAR SPRINGS OF MY FORD TAURUS HAVE FRACTURED WITHOUT ANY ACCIDENT OR COLLISION. THE COST OF REPAIR WAS UPWARDS OF $300. IN ADDITION TO THAT THE REAR TIRES HAVE UNDERGONE EXCESSIVE WEAR DUE TO BROKEN SPRINGS. CURRENTLY THE RECALL IS ONLY APPLICABLE TO FRONT SPRINGS, BUT I STRONGLY RECOMMEND THAT IT SHOULD BE EXTENDED TO REAR SPRINGS ALSO. *NM
- 12/16/2005· SUSPENSION
MY 2001 FORD TAURUS WAS AT THE FORD DEALERSHIP FOR UNRELATED REPAIRS AND THE MECHANIC FOUND THAT THE TWO REAR COIL SPRINGS WERE CRACKED AND SAID THAT THEY NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THEY THEN REPLACED THE SPRINGS. *JB
- 12/16/2004· SUSPENSION
CONSUMER RECEIVED NHTSA RECALL 04V332000 CONCERNING COIL SPRINGS IN AUGUST OF 2004.WHEN CONTACTING DEALE SHE WAS TOLD THAT THEY WOULD GET BACK TO HER UPON ARRIVAL OF PARTS. FOUR MONTHS HAS PAST AND DEALER STILL HAS NO PARTS.*AK......CONSUMER CALLED DEALER ON DECEMBER 15, 2004 INQUIRING WHEN THE PARTS WILL BE IN. WAS TOLD WOULDN'T GET THE PARTS UNTIL THE END OF JANUARY 2005. *AK
- 12/15/2009· VISIBILITY
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2001 FORD TAURUS. WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 35 MPH THE HEATING UNIT FAILED TO OPERATE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN AUTHORIZED DEALER ON TWO SEPARATE OCCASIONS, AND THE THERMOSTAT WAS REPLACED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 74,000. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 94,600.
- 12/15/2007· SUSPENSION
I PULLED OUT OF MY PARKING LOT AND HEARD A SCRAPING SOUNDS. I DROVE AROUND THE BLOCK BACK INTO MY PARKING LOT AND THE SOUND WAS THERE THE WHOLE TIME. I JACKED THE REAR OF THE CAR UP AND NOTICED THE LEFT REAR SPRING WAS BROKEN AND WAS ACTUALLY SCRAPING THE REAR TIRE. HAD IT TOW TO A SHOP AND REPLACED THE SPRINGS/STRUTS ON THE REAR. REPAIR SHOP TOOK A PICTURE OF THE OLD SPRING WHICH I HAVE. ALSO REPLACED THE REAR TIRE, IT HAD JUST SCRAPED OFF A SURFACE LAYER OF RUBBER, MIGHT HAVE BEEN OK AS IT DIDN'T GET TO THE BELT, BUT FELT SAFER WITH A NEW TIRE. *TR
- 12/14/2008· SUSPENSION
FRONT & REAR SPRINGS FAILED ON 2001 FORD TAURUS & WERE REPLACED. FRONT SPRINGS ALSO DESTROYED STRUTS & WERE COVERED UNDER A MANUFACTURER WARRANTY. REAR SPRINGS ALSO DESTROYED SHOCKS BUT WERE NOT COVERED UNDER WARRANTY. FORD DEALER INDICATED THAT THIS FAILURE WAS "COMMON" ON THIS MODEL YEAR. *TR
- 12/14/2004· TIRES
CONSUMER NOTICED THAT TIRES HAD STRESS MARKS AND TREAD SEPARATION FROM THE SIDEWALLS. CONSUMER DROVE VEHICLE TO DEALER, AND MECHANIC DETERMINED THAT ALL FOUR TIRES NEEDED TO BE REPLACED DUE TO CORROSION. CONTINENTAL, P215/60R16. *AK
- 12/13/2007· SUSPENSION
2001 FORD TAURUS. REAR SPRINGS HAVE BROKEN. WOULD HAVE PUNCTURED A TIRE, BUT WAS ABLE TO GRIND OFF BROKEN PART OF SPRING. HAVE NOT REPAIRED SPRING YET, ONLY HAVE GROUND OFF POINT OF SPRING. *TR
- 12/10/2005· SUSPENSION
LEFT REAR COIL SPRING FRACTURE. *JB
- 12/10/2004· ELECTRICAL SYSTEMFire
CONSUMER SMELLED A BURNT ODOR COMING IN FROM THE VENT. VEHICLE WAS PARKED, AND IT CAUGHT ON FIRE FROM THE CENTER CONTROL PANEL. THE FIRE WAS EXTINGUISHED BY FIRE DEPARTMENT. CONSUMER DROVE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER, AND MECHANIC STATED THAT THE CAUSE OF THE FIRE COULD NOT BE DETERMINED. *AK